‘Down With Love’ upbeat; ‘Matrix’ high on action, low on plot
- Share via
‘Down With Love’ is delightfully devious
Only Barbara Novak would come up with a scheme so devious to get
what she truly wants. In this symbolic replica of Rock Hudson’s and
Dorris Day’s “Pillow Talk,” “Down With Love” exposes women for the
common criminals they are in fighting for the thing they genuinely
desire ... love.
Novak (Renee Zellweger) is an innocent, prudent writer who wants
to publish her new book, “Down With Love,” which explores why women
don’t really need love and how it shouldn’t be a necessity in their
everyday lives. She asks to have a meeting with a publisher, Catcher
Block (Ewan McGregor), to see if he would authorize publication of
her novel. Instead, he cancels all their dates and goes out to meet
other women.
When Block finds out Novak’s objective, he refuses to let her
influence women about the realities and truths behind the concept of
love. He hides behind a false identity and essentially makes Novak
fall in love with him, causing her ideas to be viewed as
hypocritical.
But even Block’s plan doesn’t hurt her original intentions. As it
turns out, Novak has a secret of her own, which is one that even the
clever Block did not see.
This film has much sexual and crude humor, but most of it is only
funny; none is too vulgar. Peter McMannus (David Hyde Pierce) is the
actor most identified as a comedian, although the entire production
gave the audience something to laugh about. McMannus, a co-worker of
Block’s, is the more cautious and practical of the two, and he always
tries to look out for their best interests. In doing so, he creates a
world of hilarity and in turn makes the movie more enjoyable.
I find this movie to be at the top of my list for recommendations.
It’s a very cute and romantic story, in essence depicting the reality
behind the ‘60s lifestyle, and exaggerating some of the more
prominent points. The ending did throw me off and confuse me some,
but in actuality that just made it all the more interesting.
* SARA SALAM attends Corona del Mar High as a freshman.
‘Matrix Reloaded’ didn’t reload plot
“The Matrix Reloaded” is the long-awaited sequel to “The Matrix.”
This second movie continues the story of Neo (Keanu Reeves), Morpheus
(Laurence Fishburne), Trinity (Carrie-Anne Moss) and their fight
against the Matrix and its agents.
In “Reloaded,” the underground city of Zion is threatened. The
machines are tunneling toward the city to slaughter all 250,000
people there. Neo and his shipmates must find their way to the source
of the Matrix to save all the free humans of Zion.
The chase and fight scenes in “Reloaded” are even more complex
than in the first film. The sensational freeway sequence alone raises
the bar for all other action films.
“Reloaded” also uses the great “bullet time” and stop-action
camera effects that were so breathtaking in the first film.
As for everything else in “Reloaded” besides the action scenes,
yikes! The story is overstuffed with twists and pseudo-philosophical
nonsense dialogue. A few scenes are so bad they’re painful,
especially the dancing in the temple at Zion and the parts in the
restaurant.
Andy and Larry Wachowski, who wrote and directed “The Matrix” and
“The Matrix Reloaded,” seem to have forgotten that even the best
action scenes in the world really need a decent underlying script.
The plot of “Reloaded” lacks the intensity and tension that made “The
Matrix” enjoyable.
If you cared only about the great fight scenes and special effects
in the original, then go see the sequel for the same reasons. If you
think things like plot and dialogue are important in a film, then
stay away.
* TRICIA BEHLE lives in Newport Beach and works as a software
validator.
All the latest on Orange County from Orange County.
Get our free TimesOC newsletter.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Daily Pilot.